Discover top fintech news and events!
Subscribe to FinTech Weekly's newsletter
Read by executives at JP Morgan, Coinbase, Blackrock, Klarna and more
Traditional banks once embodied stability. They were the guardians of financial trust, the gatekeepers of global economies, and the institutions that defined the very architecture of modern finance. But history is unforgiving, and those who fail to adapt inevitably fade into irrelevance.
The question isn’t whether traditional banks are becoming obsolete—it’s how quickly they’re being replaced.
Consider this: In 2024, digital-first banks like N26 saw their revenues surge by 40%, while legacy institutions struggled to eke out even a 0.4% increase in deposits. Meanwhile, U.S. banks recorded their first deposit decline since 1995, a 4.8% drop that signals more than just a rough year—it signals systemic decay.
The shift isn’t gradual. It’s seismic.
The reasons are obvious to anyone paying attention. Fintechs aren’t just offering banking services; they’re offering experiences—streamlined, intuitive, and mobile-first. Over 55% of U.S. customers now primarily manage their finances through mobile apps. That’s not a shift; it’s a complete behavioral overhaul.
Legacy banks, by contrast, are weighed down by bureaucracy, outdated infrastructure, and an institutional arrogance that assumes their dominance is eternal. HSBC’s sluggish digital pivot and NatWest’s closure of 53 branches in 2025 show that even industry giants are crumbling under their own inertia.
There are exceptions, of course. JPMorgan Chase has moved decisively into digital banking, amassing over 1.6 million customers in the UK through its Chase platform in 2023. But even these efforts feel more like contingency plans than a real shift in strategy.
The numbers tell a clearer story than any PR campaign. The global digital banking market is expected to hit $22.3 trillion by 2026. Trust Bank in Singapore has already crossed the one-million-customer mark, becoming the country’s fourth-largest retail bank by user count.
This isn’t evolution—it’s disruption. And in every disruption, there are winners and losers.
The winners? Fintechs that are agile, customer-focused, and technologically superior. Challenger banks, in particular, are leading this charge—offering not just better rates but reshaping the very idea of what a bank should be.
The losers? Banks that still believe their marble-clad branches and century-old reputations will save them.
Yet, the narrative isn’t entirely one-sided.
Take Bendigo and Adelaide Bank—in 2024, they posted a $562 million cash profit, exceeding expectations. Nearly 40% of their customers are ahead on repayments, and 85% hold substantial financial buffers. Meanwhile, Banco Santander invested €3.6 billion into digital transformation since 2022, launching a proprietary platform, Gravity, to streamline operations across 164 million customers.
Trust remains the traditional banks' advantage. A 2022 Morning Consult study revealed that over 60% of consumers still trust established banks over fintech companies.
Even customer satisfaction reflects this complexity. Chase UK recently topped Britain’s rankings for retail bank satisfaction, proving traditional banks can still lead—if they evolve.
But there’s another factor often overlooked. Traditional banks are essential to government financial systems. They help implement monetary policies, support government borrowing, and provide economic stability. Governments rely on banks to buy bonds, fund public projects, and manage national payment systems.
In Pakistan, banks hold over 54% of their assets in government securities. This shows how intertwined banks are with government stability. Even as challenger banks rise, offering streamlined services and innovative digital solutions, traditional banks remain essential to state functioning.
This shifts the focus from survival to relevance. Challenger banks may dominate headlines with their innovation and speed, but traditional banks still anchor financial security. They can’t afford complacency, and governments can’t afford their collapse either.
The age of inertia is over. This isn’t just a wake-up call for banks—it’s a test of their role in a financial system that may outlive them.
The real question is no longer whether challenger banks will replace traditional banks. It’s whether these two forces can coexist in a new financial ecosystem where stability and innovation are no longer in conflict but part of the same evolving structure.
If banks—both traditional and challenger—fail to recognize their shared role in this evolution, the consequences won’t just be measured in market share or quarterly earnings. They’ll be written into the very fabric of economic history.
